pretty in pink

57493176crayolapink123520200933440pmshe was in spain the oher day to get some essential prize like the most beautiful face of the year. more later. meanwhile you can enjoy a few pics here.
event was called something like glamour beleza and took place in madrid on the 20th of may. i much prefer this outfit and style to what she was wearing at the met. she (?) got to personalise stella mccartney with the pink blazer and with her very darish balmain boots, to avoid, as i read in a blog, ‘girly overkill’. and if you want to compare her to celebrities wearing the same dress, have a look here. now i feel like a fashion blogger!!

Advertisements

turning exotic into dariotic

i'm not here

i'm not here

this breathtaking shot is an unexpected appendix posted today by ladyflash.  i still don’t have time to post properly. just 2 things. 1) this editorial is a proof of how more subtle and refined patrick demarchelier is than ‘hammerio’ testino. could you imagine what messy kitsch editorial would testino have shot? 2) did stylist and crew forget to bring jewellery with them? all accessories are daria’s and stylist’s!! and rings by *cough cough kennyboy*, that evidently daria has to somehow pay… i meant, to somehow help!! :p

lady gala

2va02o82evzwxt

and when i was about to put down the usual comment on boredaria so evidently hating being there in any pore of hers, i was pleased to see these pictures that show our girl at the best of her natural attitude. go daria, you know we like you this way!

**
so i can’t really understand those who said she looked fabolous at the event. she looked like a fabolous disaster! dress was rather opinable, hair was the usual mess, make-up was unbalanced with those smokey aggressive eyes and pale face and lips and – as usual with too strong make-up – there was a drag effect that i wouldn’t exactly define as charming… she looked like she had said ‘do whatever you want, but be as fast as you can and don’t bother me too much’. the result is that she was everything but elegant and classy. i still think ot her 2005 white chanel dress… beautiful! i wonder if those ppl who styled are so disoriented – or worried – that they just interpretate her un-adhesion to gender stereotypes as a matter of pushing hard and going smokey and all rock…  anyways, she was a style mess, but a lovely style mess indeed, as usual.

as a consolation let’s enjoy this pic (from style.com) that was taken at an event last saturday, “spring field’. guy has a name, but i’ve forgotten it meanwhile. i think he’s a creative director.
sbk5u1

meet at the met… or boredaria is back

e5qvwnthis is all we got at the moment. neither getty nor pmc list her in the captions… so….
no slices of butt in view this year. maybe it’s a sober post-recession spirit. looks like make-up is inspired to vogue paris ‘esprit libre’ and i think make-up artist was the same. nothing new. i would have like someting more daring!!

please note her evident pleasure to be at that event. happiness is spread from hair to boots!! all the pics were posted at her tfs thread, from page 50 on.

h&m vid: meta-fun & meta-irony

too bad it’s not daria’s voice!

**
THE DAY AFTER. i still don’t understand where this vid came from and if it’s the official summer 09 commercial. anyways, “horrible” is the word i have heard the most, but personally i find it so silly that eventually i had fun watching it. maybe mine is a meta-fun, where i just focus on daria in bed saying ‘boring‘ to that guy and then ‘time for a change’ or something like that. then i have fun watching at the difference between her sportish running style and the final scene where she’s all feminine and languishing caressing that really perfect example of 007-like masculinity called matthiew williamson. btw, i wonder if they put a 1 meter cube under his feet to make him look taller than the models!!

a metter of genres: science-fiction vs. realism

a matter of genres: science-fiction vs. realism

so for all these reasons i must have so much fun watching this video! i find it so ironic, but maybe not for the reasons it was made!!

clueless

"so please tell me, which face do you want from me?!"

"so please tell me, which kind of expression do you want from me?!"

bah, maybe it’s me clueless about heterosexual charme, but what kind of pic is that meant to be?! i can’t see any sexual appeal in her face in this pic. she looks like she’s waiting for instructions. like ‘ok, i put my hand in my hair as i’ve learnt i have to do when you want me to play heterosexist fiction, and then?! what the fuck do i have to do?!?’. okay, maybe it’s me clueless making her clueless too, but c’mon!! this picture looks very slapdash!!

gendervixen!!!

yeeeees!!!

yeeeees!!! revenge!!!!

so girls, don’t be shy… get your gay attitude out and confess, yes confess the truth! how much you would like to be spun up and down by superdaria!!! cos i’m sure you are all there drooling at the pics!!! :pppp
more comments when proper scans are available!! let me only say that this 2009 has been great from the point of view of editorials! maybe i’m not crazy about the cover… but i will reflect on it!

img00688298113
it must be because it’s less dynamic. the pose has an 80’s vibe that is quite different from the editorial… it’s more colonial than a gender daring version of supervixen… well, certainly it’s better than the previous august 08 cover, still by inez & vinoodh, that was so retouched that you could hardly recognise it was daria! even nose is almost hers!

pics here and here. you can also have a look at the snaps made by deborah of the other editorial here.